Cross-post from www.malignantlibiocy.blogivists.com
Question: Does every group of like-minded deranged individuals have an official organization? Or, is it just the psychopathic predators that target children, who feel the need to organize?
Pedophiles have NAMBLA and those that view children as inconvenient or punishments have NARAL. The disgusting membership of one seeks to use children for their sexual pleasure while the disgusting membership of the other seek to kill children that result from sexual pleasure. Both organizations advocate harming children, the main differentiating factor is the age of the victim... that is assuming of course, that NARAL members have some upper age limit for slaughter. This might not be the case, however, since the type of individual that views the decision to kill the baby in the womb (or allow a born baby to die unattended should be the sole discretion of the mother) could reasonably believe that any killing is acceptable as long as the victim's mother has given consent. This latter point of view could provide a permanent solution to behavior problems at liberal day care centers.
I don't know if NAMBLA is supporting Barack The Baby Killer for president (and I refuse to go to their web-site to find out) but NARAL proudly supports Obama and his proposed policy, "No Child Left Behind... Unless It Is In A Soiled Linen Closet At A Hospital/Abortion Mill Associated With Trinity United."
What would these organizations be without vocal advocates? My answer is, thankfully silent, but that is not the case. The culture of perversion and innocent death represented by such organizations are indeed nurtured by their champions. One champion of innocent death is Slate.com editor Dahlia Lithwick, whose Thursday offering, "Abortion Contortion: John McCain bets the farm that women aren't listening," serves as a disappointing reminder of the evil and ignorance that influences politics. Dahlia Mistress Of Death writes:
|
Voters, and especially women voters who want to make their own reproductive decisions, need to wake up and smell the asparagus. In July, for example, a Pew poll showed that 56 percent of the electorate didn't know where McCain stood on abortion. Listen up, because he's telling us now. To the extent McCain was ever independent-minded at all on reproductive rights, he's not anymore. In 2000, McCain begged Bush to amend language in the GOP platform, which calls for a human-life amendment banning all abortions and provides no exceptions for rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. This week he indicated that he won't work to change that platform. That's a position espoused by fewer than 20 percent of the electorate. In the religion forum last weekend at Saddleback Church in California, McCain announced that life begins at the moment of conception and promised, I will be a pro-life president, and this presidency will have pro-life policies. In April he told Chris Matthews that the rights of the unborn is one of my most important values. He has bragged about his consistent zero rating from NARAL. He has explicitly said that his Supreme Court choices will be animated by his desire to overturn Roe. wrote:
|
Does Dahlia support the death penalty for the rapist in the event of rape, or does she believe the only involved party deserving the harshest of sentences is the baby?
Why is it that these people use such misleading language as "reproductive choices?" It is obvious to anyone that cares to view the situation honestly that anti-abortion does not equate to anti-choice. The choice to engage in sexual activity, just like the choice to take steps to avoid pregnancy are separate from the choice to kill a baby. This "lady" chooses to mislead then complains about information being given to abortion seekers as dishonest:
|
So much of the abortion debate involves treating women like children. It was bad enough when Justice Anthony Kennedy told women last year that we are too unstable to be trusted with decisions about what to do with our own bodies. It is an outrage that physicians in South Dakota are being instructed to lie to us for our own good. wrote:
|
Dahlia should be thankful that the abortion debate does not involve "treating women like children" as she so dishonestly claims. If it did and NARAL's position on children were respected, the abortion debate would involve killing women! I am sure neither NARAL nor NAMBLA would want to receive the treatment they promote for innocent children. Obviously any debate that involves a participant having her skull pierced and her brain vacuumed out would be hard to stomach and probably wouldn't be aired by most news channels no matter how much the program directors thought it might help the candidacy of Barack Obama.
Tags: Abortion NARAL Obama
Favorites
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Furl
Magnolia
StumbleUpon
Google
Yahoo MyWeb
