I am new here and if anyone comments (or whatever the term here is) i will post the second part (this is only the first part). Also, the myspace account above has my other blogs i've posted.

In 1919, Theodore Roosevelt wrote in a letter to the America Defense Society, "In the first place we should insist that the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equity with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming an American and nothing but an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any flag of a nation to which we are hostile. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Every year, the status quo regarding securities of illegal immigration spirals even farther down than any common, sensible American would have estimated. Our former presidents, especially the ones involved during our industrial revolution and early twentieth century, spin in their graves when they see our loss of sovereignty, high crime rates, rising likelihood of terrorist actions, a weak foreign policy towards our Latin American partners, and our nation's economic drainage; all in due or done course, because of the parasitical harm entrenched into the US by the effects of illegal immigration. The first duty of our elected representatives, furthermore, it to protect the rights of the American people and uphold the constitution. But the sole loyalty Theodore Roosevelt pertained to in regards to the American people, is now just a hulking paradox in today's politics when the majority of politicians have sold his/her soul to the corporations that feed, fiscally speaking, off the cheap labor of illegal immigrants.

The toll of illegal pioneering has come in more forms than just a harsh collapsing attack of the economy, but has reached other mediations with losses to the American national sovereignty and an increasing likely hood of another terrorist attack. America's sovereignty is now just a pawn in the game of political chess, when our politicians now put his/her wallet above the welfare of the United States. Illegal immigration is putting our nation's sovereignty at risk because of a fiscal plan in place known collectively as the North American Union or the Tri-lateral Union. The North American Union is a tri-sponsored plan with President George Bush, President Felipe Calderon of Mexico, and Prime Minister Steven Harpor of Canada. Its plans are to compete with the European Union's Markets and the ever increasing value of the Euro; and these economic workings have been progressing since 2006 with no signs of a terminus coming in the near future because of the corrupt politics in relations to the North American governments. The developments of the North American Union show themselves in the form of rising inflation rates, the development of the NAFTA superhighway, open borders, and low tariffs which encourage foreign investments of the American infrastructure.

These arrangements of the North American Union tie into the underachieving status quo of the US domestic policy towards illegal immigration. Due to a fear of worsening relations between Mexico and the US; American politicians and government officials choose not to enforce the laws of our judicial system which rigorously state that immigrants who have traveled to America illegally, are not even supposed to be on our soil and are definitely not entitled to the programs and luxuries paid by the American taxpayers. A central component of our porous borders and unlawfulness towards America's own judicial policies is due to the politicians of the North American Union embracing the impossibility of a change to the status quo. Indirectly, the North American Union will result in worse problems within the US, not just economically and judicially; but far worse aspects: the loss of our currency, flag, national anthem, and many other national entities that protect America's sovereignty. In conclusion of the North American Union, America's stance regarding legal immigration, or lack thereof, results from a scare of worsening our relations with Mexico, which has made it morally and politically impossible to change the status quo of immigration.

Now in regards to terrorism within the USA, our open borders are leading to a higher risk of another attack within America. You may ask yourselves "why are our airports so secure that a 84-year old woman in a wheel chair will get a strip search to prevent another terrorist attack in the USA, and yet we leave our southern borders uncovered so that if a terrorist truly wanted to get in, he/she could sneak in from Mexico to the USA just like many of the illegal Latin Americans within the USA do already?" The answer doesn't lie within a lack of security, but more of an ignorance of checks and balances regarding national security. Post-9/11, America established new ways to prevent another terrorist aggression with the creation of the Patriot Act, wire-tapping contracts with phone companies, the department of homeland security, and an increased usage of Naval base, Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. But the paradox inserts itself when America feels defended because its citizens lose their rights entitled by the constitution in the name of security, yet according to a 2006 homeland security press-release, 650 suspected terrorists were apprehended while crossing the Texas-Mexico border.

As incongruous as it may be understood, high numbers of American victims of theft, rape, and murder along the Southwest border has not encouraged new reform of border security and judicial processing of illegal immigrants. With the inconceivable statistics concerning crime rates amongst illegal immigrants such as 95% of the warrants in Los Angeles are for illegal immigrants; the evidence for political and defensive alteration is abundant. Of the estimated 7% of the US population being illegal immigrants; 40.1% of all inmates in Arizona detention centers are illegal immigrants and 30% of convicted inmates in the state and federal prisons are illegal aliens costing $3 million dollars a day. The percentages may bring shock, but the shock should not be on account of the numbers, but on the fact that the American government and law enforcement allows these blasphemies to continue reoccurrence. What most do not realize, complying with the laws already in place by the American government, state and federal, could prevent the majority of this criminal activity.

Smuggling drugs by way of infiltrating the Southwest border, has proven to be, statistically speaking, the worst part of criminal enterprise economically and historically. Since the presidency of Ronald Reagan in 1980s, stability regarding the progress with the War on Drugs is just that; stable. Making proficient change to decelerate drug smuggling, drug usage, drug violence, drug creation, and drug dependency, has shown difficulty because of inadequate defense against the chief import of drugs, illegal alien drug smuggling. Drug smuggling across the Mexican border accounts for 80% of the heroin and 50% of cocaine in the USA; and for the cocaine at least 4.5 million pounds is smuggled across the frontier with a street value of at least $72 billion dollars. These numbers should hold undeniability that instituting more security and creating a military specified wall, is the principal first step in ameliorating the progression of the war on drugs.

Contemplation referring to why many Hispanic immigrants have traveled seeking permanent or temporary residence, has usually been explained with Mexico being to poor to take care of themselves and the USA, "containing an abundance of work and resources", will cure the unemployment and poverty of Mexican immigrants. A feeble foreign policy towards Mexico and other Latin American Countries has and will not hinder a continued illegal immigration to the USA. You may ask, "Why do we need to strengthen our foreign policy and make it harder on these countries than the present situation already has placed itself upon?" The reasons aren't to morally, economically, and spiritually destruct Mexico because America feels a need to backlash with disdain. It is because Mexico has the resources, opportunity for work, and a fortunate location needed to uphold a middle-class economy. If an American foreign relations committee were to force Mexico to evenly distribute taxes and, moreover, spread its resources amongst it poverty-stricken citizens from its 11 billionaires (10 of whom made the 2007 Forbes list), Mexicans could function in their own country without the apparent need to come up to generous USA. Besides upholding mining resources and being the 4th richest nation in oil amongst the world, Mexico in 2001 had the highest GDP in Latin America, 22.5% ahead of Brazil. As a result of poor governmental policies within Mexico, Hispanics are financially forced to travel to the USA illegally to stay above its own poverty level and without a North American intervention, this will continue and both the citizens of Mexico and the Economy of the USA will continue to fall expectedly until the status quo concerning foreign relations is updated.

www.myspace.com/jordan978